Skip to main content

There are no short-cuts to the things worth doing.

So what is Engineering? Is it some clandestine clan of old people safeguarding the secret of the Universe from prying eyes? Or is it some fancy degree which can be fathomed by only a selected few who pass a scrutinizing test taken in few hours? Or is it some hocus-pocus black magic meant to be understood only by a selected few? For most of us this is the picture we have for engineering:


Yes! Engineering is the sum total of the wisdom of many people smarter than us and we as students can only have a part of the knowledge, isn’t it?

Ah, the good news is engineering is nothing more than physics. Yes, that is correct all that is around us is a direct result of applying simple (?) laws of nature. No, wait a minute, so does that mean that the buildings we see around us is a direct result of applying the laws of motion and not because of some high-tech code that the secret society of civil engineers have imposed upon the society? This is blasphemy! How can one say something against the bible of engineers? Every young aspirant goes through the futile grill of learning painstaking formulae of mechanics, structural analysis along with “higher mathematics” to know that these are of little importance. It is the code that dictates the industry and all that a structural engineer has to do is to faithfully follow these set of rules in order to gain salvation.

Unfortunately, this is the story of most of the students. Even the researchers are more involved in ‘cookbook-izing” engineering. More and more students are inclined to memorize a formula, spit it out in the exam and forget about it. They feel that they can always look up. People are involved more in standardizing this wonderful profession. Even the government feels to have assembly line workers who can do the same design time and again and have no sense of innovation. Students tend to forget the first principles they learn mostly in their first couple of year of college and often struggle with their design classes they take in the latter two years. This is a fundamentally wrong approach.

The world does not need human-calculators, it needs competent engineers who can apply the concepts of engineering to solve vastly varying problems. There cannot be a “one-size-fit-all” approach, at least not in civil/structural engineering. While no amount of classroom teaching can inculcate this feel one can get only through practice, it is extremely important for a person to grasp fundamental concepts underlying the problem. Let me give you an example, a person in the business of designing residential buildings may easily estimate the dead load or the live load of any building only by visual inspection, but it is always good for him to have the tool, the technique to calculate the loads for any building, or for that matter any structure be it an industrial building or a military bunker. Good engineers are not the people who know the problem beforehand, but are those who can solve them. Now don’t get me wrong. An experienced engineer is always reliable. But it is because that he could digest the concepts well. And it is always good to know the answer before calculating it, so that you know if your numbers went wrong. But one must never under-estimate the importance of the notion that set up those calculations in the first place.


 Engineering is not merely science, but is an art in itself. There are many solutions to a problem. And like any art, one must appreciate the beauty of the structure and not just calcs.  And what a student must appreciate is that sometimes the most optimized answer is not the best one. Engineering is something that is closely sandwiched between physics and banking. While a building gets a nod from physics, it is usually the banks who decide the fate of a structure. It is to note that in a typical high-rise building, the cost of the structural frame is less than 15%. So generally people do not feel the need to have a precise analysis as it may turn out to be very “costly”. However, a passionate engineer will always strive to do the thing the right way, the honest way because there are no shortcuts to the things worth doing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Possible types of failures in a steel structure

We, structural engineers design all the members of a building, whether it might be a column, beam, a tie member or a strut anything, but we design it to resist certain forces. We predict a load, calculate forces in different members and design them member to resist a particular load. But sometimes because of some undetermined or unpredicted load the forced in certain members increase to a value which it cannot withstand and the LObmember fails. But what are the different possibilities of failure? How can a member fail? Don't worry, here is what we are going to talk about. The possible types of failures in steel structures. Steel is a ductile material and to build a structure using steel is like setting up a huge Jigsaw puzzle. You have 1000 different members and you need to connect them and tada..!! Your structure is up. But it is not as simple as it is visible. Steel being a very strong material  leads to slender members. Now you can imagine the difficulties associated with it

Ductility and Elasticity

Ductility and elasticity,the two most important terms that are discussed frequently in structural engineering. Elasticity defines about how much the material is elastic, that is to which extent the deformations are proportional to the forces applied on the material. While ductility defines the capability of the material to get itself stretched beyond the elastic zone. Let me explain this by taking a real life example. Take a two different material, a rubber band and a very thin steel or copper wire.  Pull the rubber with your hands by applying the force in exactly opposite direction, and force means a tiny amount of pull. You will notice that the mount of deformations caused by the small pull is very large, but when you leave the rubber band it will come back to it's original position. This means that the rubber band is elastic in nature. Oh, now you got something in your bucket. But wait, here comes the question. Till what magnitude of force can rubber band behave in such

What is a Response Reduction factor?

In our previous blogs we discussed about  Response Spectrum Analysis ,  Earthquake and Energy Dissipation  as well as  Ductility demand in structures during seismic loading . In response spectrum analysis topics like mode shapes, modal mass participation factors, derivation of response spectrum we discussed. In earthquake vs energy dissipation blog, we talked about energy dissipated from buildings through strain energy, inelastic energy, hysteresis, damping and ductility. In ductility demand we discussed about importance of ductile detailing and how it helps a building to work during earthquakes just like a marathon runner during long runs.  Generally inelastic energy dissipation, damping energy, ductility demand and ductility capacity, hysteresis loops are all captured when a nonlinear model is built, and time history analysis is performed for the structure. But to do nonlinear time history analysis, it takes a long time to build a model. The performance evaluation and result ve